<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Switched to WordPress and here&#8217;s why</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lancealbertson.com/2009/01/switched-to-wordpress-and-heres-why/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lancealbertson.com/2009/01/switched-to-wordpress-and-heres-why/</link>
	<description>Musings of a UNIX SysAdmin, jazz lover, and wine/beer snob</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 12:12:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.lancealbertson.com/2009/01/switched-to-wordpress-and-heres-why/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 02:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.lancealbertson.com/?p=47#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Right tool for the right job is the key. What I like to ask people (when determining which way to learn with open source CMSs) is &quot;how many people are going to be contributing?&quot;

If you&#039;re running a site with less than ten folks, who you could describe as staff/editors/friends/co-authors and you&#039;re only putting out one basically one type of content... then by all means please use WordPress and don&#039;t think about Drupal.

BUT, if you plan to have 100+ contributing users want to have various type of content, specific views of subsets with filtering, user profiles and do things like mobile uploading... WordPress just won&#039;t cut it. (However, there are some examples out there of WP cores for bigger sites.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right tool for the right job is the key. What I like to ask people (when determining which way to learn with open source CMSs) is &#8220;how many people are going to be contributing?&#8221;</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re running a site with less than ten folks, who you could describe as staff/editors/friends/co-authors and you&#8217;re only putting out one basically one type of content&#8230; then by all means please use WordPress and don&#8217;t think about Drupal.</p>
<p>BUT, if you plan to have 100+ contributing users want to have various type of content, specific views of subsets with filtering, user profiles and do things like mobile uploading&#8230; WordPress just won&#8217;t cut it. (However, there are some examples out there of WP cores for bigger sites.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.lancealbertson.com/2009/01/switched-to-wordpress-and-heres-why/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 04:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.lancealbertson.com/?p=47#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Just to amend your paragraph on Drupal wishlist...

# Implement module installation via Drupal - Like Chisimba
# Implement module upgrades via Drupal - Like Chisimba

Chisimba does all that as well as single click installs of common module configurations.

I see now that a few projects are starting to emulate Chisimba in remote module updates and upgrades/installs. Good to know that Chisimba was the first!

-- Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to amend your paragraph on Drupal wishlist&#8230;</p>
<p># Implement module installation via Drupal &#8211; Like Chisimba<br />
# Implement module upgrades via Drupal &#8211; Like Chisimba</p>
<p>Chisimba does all that as well as single click installs of common module configurations.</p>
<p>I see now that a few projects are starting to emulate Chisimba in remote module updates and upgrades/installs. Good to know that Chisimba was the first!</p>
<p>&#8211; Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lance</title>
		<link>http://www.lancealbertson.com/2009/01/switched-to-wordpress-and-heres-why/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>lance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 03:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.lancealbertson.com/?p=47#comment-4</guid>
		<description>WordPress appears to be great for simple to medium sites, but like you say when you get into more varying content that&#039;s where Drupal shines. It would be interesting to see a community within Drupal devoted to using it as a blog with modern features. Maybe there is but it didn&#039;t show up in my searches that&#039;s for sure. A &quot;one stop shop for blogging&quot; would be better than just enabling the simple blog module.

Thanks for the comment :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WordPress appears to be great for simple to medium sites, but like you say when you get into more varying content that&#8217;s where Drupal shines. It would be interesting to see a community within Drupal devoted to using it as a blog with modern features. Maybe there is but it didn&#8217;t show up in my searches that&#8217;s for sure. A &#8220;one stop shop for blogging&#8221; would be better than just enabling the simple blog module.</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron B. Hockley</title>
		<link>http://www.lancealbertson.com/2009/01/switched-to-wordpress-and-heres-why/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron B. Hockley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 03:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.lancealbertson.com/?p=47#comment-3</guid>
		<description>As a WordPress fan (but not zealot... at least I don&#039;t think so) I&#039;m always interested in hearing why folks use WordPress (or why they don&#039;t).  One consistent theme I hear from folks who have used both Drupal and WordPress is that Drupal is great if you have a bunch of varying content (and some small part of it might be a blog) while WordPress shines when used for a blog-centric site with relatively simple forms of other content.

Welcome to WordPress :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a WordPress fan (but not zealot&#8230; at least I don&#8217;t think so) I&#8217;m always interested in hearing why folks use WordPress (or why they don&#8217;t).  One consistent theme I hear from folks who have used both Drupal and WordPress is that Drupal is great if you have a bunch of varying content (and some small part of it might be a blog) while WordPress shines when used for a blog-centric site with relatively simple forms of other content.</p>
<p>Welcome to WordPress :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
